Normal, single, jewish and new to this tribe! Yay me! Can't say Ive met normal and single let alone jewish. Not discouraged...Im patient!!
posted by:
|
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Tue, September 13, 2005 - 1:41 PMWelcome!
I saw your pictures. Is there a shortage of Jewish guys in California? -
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Tue, September 13, 2005 - 2:33 PMWell it depends on what "kind" of jewboys were talkin about. The kind Im lookin for, yes, there is a HUGE shortage! -
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Tue, September 13, 2005 - 6:20 PMDo detail your specifications. -
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Tue, September 13, 2005 - 8:17 PMHmmm, lets see. Someone smart, not necessarily formally educated, has been in the party scene in the past, has done his fair share of havic in the world and is now ready to have an "adult" relationship and chill. Itd be cool if he has some tattoos, doesn't look like he was bar mitzvahed a couple of years ago. Ya know what would totally rock? If he had a bad ass harley too. Oh yes, and he should know how to handle himself in a hostile situation. Im completely cracked out on Krav Maga, feel pretty confident and would prefer the same in a man... Oh yeah, and he should appriciate firearms. I have a gun and love to go shooting. Oh, wait, one more thing for now. He must love big dogs. I have a pit and shes adorable.
Thats all for now... -
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Tue, September 13, 2005 - 10:09 PMI wish you lots of luck. Just a couple of comments for this discussion:
Lots of Jews believe in the religious prohibition against tatoos.
Self-defense courses are nice; street smarts are better.
It's next to impossible to have a gone permit here in New York City, which has the largest Jewish population in the country. -
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Wed, September 14, 2005 - 7:36 AMwell i suppose its all a matter of opinion. And yes, lots of jews also enjoy/prefer/are ok with tattoos. Clearly, the orthodox route is one that im not interested in heading, although I have a ton of respect for.
Im in LA and I don't have a gun permit either....
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Shalom everyone!
Fri, November 4, 2005 - 4:16 PMPeace,
I am WesleyWes, Noahide from Tha Lou. I dont understand normal? Does this mean Jews that dont eat cheese burgers or do?
By the way tha U.N. wants ta own tha internet...
October 27, 2005
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers are urging the Bush administration to resist a push from other countries to shift control of the Internet to the United Nations, arguing that such a move would stifle innovation and free expression.
"Is it going to become a vehicle for global taxation of domain names? Are you going to allow folks who have demonstrated a pattern of suppression of content, are they going to be put in charge of running this thing?" said Minnesota Republican Sen. Norm Coleman, sponsor of a Senate resolution that calls for the Internet's core addressing system to remain under U.S. control.
Coleman's resolution, along with similar remarks by senior lawmakers in the House of Representatives, should give a boost to U.S. negotiators as they prepare for a United Nations summit in Tunisia next month where the issue will loom large.
Though no one country controls the Internet as a whole, the U.S. Commerce Department maintains final authority over the domain-name system that matches easy-to-remember names like "example.com" with the Internet Protocol numbers that are assigned to each computer on the Internet.
That system is overseen by a California-based nonprofit group called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN.
If other countries refuse to recognize ICANN's legitimacy, Internet users in different parts of the globe could wind up at different Web sites when they type "www.example.com" into their browsers.
GLOBAL RESOURCE
Countries like Brazil and Iran have argued in a series of meetings over the past two years that the Internet is now a global resource that should be overseen by the United Nations or some other international body.
The European Union withdrew its support of the current system last month.
The United States has made clear that it intends to maintain control.
In an interview, Coleman said a bureaucratic body like the United Nations' International Telecommunications Union would slow innovation and extend its reach beyond the domain-name system. Countries that censor online content could use the forum to ban free expression elsewhere, he said. Continued ...
© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.
groups.yahoo.com/group/Liberty411
